[Santana 22] Thoughts about mast step.

Michael Kennedy michaelkennedy05 at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 7 01:02:44 EST 2012

You do want the center of effort aft. Tom did a ton of work. If you're lazy like me you can leave the mast step where it is and make sure you have max headstay length for a lot of mast rake


On Mar 6, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Russell Whitaker <russell.whitaker at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Tom Montoya <antrim27 at aol.com> wrote:
>> The fore / aft position of the mast step is most important for this
>> notoriously lee helm boat.  Max aft on the deck step,  solid deck step (no
>> mush deck), chain plates and bulk head are most important.  Naturally
>> supporting the mast step with a perpendicular support (ie cross beam) has to
>> be good too.
>> 
>> Meli'ki is set up to max numbers in these regards and if I say so myself,
>> pretty darn fast!
>> 
>> Good luck to all this coming One Design racing season!
>> 
>> Still one of the best SF Bay boats around.
>> 
> 
> Well now, *that* sounds like a challenge, if ever I heard one...
> 
> R
> 
>> Wish I could be there.
>> 
>> Tom Montoya
>> Meli'ki
>> 5194
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Russell Whitaker <russell.whitaker at gmail.com>
>> To: Derek Meyer <djmeyer16 at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: keay <keay at keay3.net>; tuna <tuna at myfleet.org>
>> Sent: Tue, Mar 6, 2012 9:55 am
>> Subject: Re: [Santana 22] Thoughts about mast step.
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Derek Meyer <djmeyer16 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Keay,
>>> 
>>> My step is just held in with 4 lag bolts.  While you're right about the
>>> forces, the support beam and standing rigging are what really keep the
>>> mast
>>> up and in place.  I wouldn't sweat the base plate too much.
>>> 
>> 
>> ...and then there's the compression post, when and where it's actually
>> used...
>> 
>> Russell
>> 
>>> -Derek
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Keay Edwards <keay at keay3.net>
>>> To: tuna at myfleet.org
>>> Sent: Monday, March 5, 2012 9:40 PM
>>> Subject: [Santana 22] Thoughts about mast step.
>>> 
>>> Hola folks,
>>> 
>>> Major geek question. Any one have any cogent thoughts on the lateral
>>> forces
>>> applied to the mast step on the Santana 22? I am curious if the mast base
>>> plate needs to be through bolted to the underside of the support beam.
>>> 
>>> I heard somewhere that the force for every 1 lb applied to forward motion
>>> of
>>> the boat there are 4 lbs applied laterally. This is close hauled.
>>> 
>>> On further reflection the ratio of 1 to 4 might be for an unstayed mast.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Keay
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tuna mailing list
>>> Tuna at myfleet.org
>>> http://myfleet.org/mailman/listinfo/tuna
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tuna mailing list
>>> Tuna at myfleet.org
>>> http://myfleet.org/mailman/listinfo/tuna
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Russell Whitaker
>> http://twitter.com/OrthoNormalRuss / http://orthonormalruss.blogspot.com/
>> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/russell-whitaker/0/b86/329
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tuna mailing list
>> Tuna at myfleet.org
>> http://myfleet.org/mailman/listinfo/tuna
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Russell Whitaker
> http://twitter.com/OrthoNormalRuss / http://orthonormalruss.blogspot.com/
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/russell-whitaker/0/b86/329
> _______________________________________________
> Tuna mailing list
> Tuna at myfleet.org
> http://myfleet.org/mailman/listinfo/tuna

myfleet list hosting - Santana 22 Class Site - More information about the Tuna mailing list